علوم و فنون نظامی

علوم و فنون نظامی

مدل‌سازی مفهومی عوامل مؤثر بر تاب‌آوری زنجیره تأمین و رتبه‌بندی تأمین‌کنندگان تجهیزات درمانی بیمارستان بعثت تهران با کاربست ترکیبی Fuzzy Delphi، PLS و Improved TOPSIS

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
مظاهر رضایی فر 1
رضا اسلامی 2
نیما صابری فرد 3
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت، تهران، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
2 اﺳﺘﺎدﻳﺎر، داﻧﺸﮕﺎه ﻋﻠﻮم پزشکی آﺟﺎ، داﻧﺸﻜﺪه ﻃﺐ هواﻓﻀﺎ و زیرسطحی، تهران، اﻳﺮان.
3 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، واحد رشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رشت، ایران.
10.22034/qjmst.2024.1975581.1819
چکیده
هدف: هدف اصلی این مقاله مدل‌سازی مفهومی عوامل مؤثر بر تاب‌آوری زنجیره تأمین و رتبه‌بندی تأمین‌کنندگان تجهیزات درمانی بیمارستان بعثت تهران با کاربست ترکیبی دلفی فازی، حداقل مربعات جزئی و تاپسیس توسعه‌یافته است.
روش: این پژوهش بر اساس هدف کاربردی و بر اساس گردآوری داده‌ها توصیفی است. بدین منظور ابتدا عوامل مؤثر بر تاب‌آوری زنجیره تأمین با توجه به ادبیات پژوهش شناسایی و دسته‌بندی شد. سپس با استفاده از روش دلفی فازی، نظرات خبرگان در ارتباط با مؤلفه‌های مؤثر مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. جامعه آماری پژوهش خبرگان حوزه علوم پزشکی هستند که با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند 14 نفر به‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند.
یافته‌ها: در بخش تجزیه‌وتحلیل یافته‌ها با استفاده از روش دلفی فازی، بیست معیار انتخاب شد. سپس برای مدل‌سازی مفهومی عوامل مؤثر بر تاب‌آوری زنجیرۀ تأمین از رویکرد حداقل مربعات جزئی استفاده شد که در این بخش سیزده معیار برای ارائه مدل نهایی گردید. در ادامه برای رتبه‌بندی تأمین‌کنندگان از روش تاپسیس توسعه‌یافته استفاده گردید و تأمین‌کنندگان رتبه‌بندی شدند.
نتیجه‌گیری: با توجه به نتایج به‌دست‌آمده از ارائه مدل مفهومی، معیار تهیه و تدوین برنامه پشتیبان، طرح بازیابی، برنامه‌ریزی فاجعه و فرماندهی آن(مدیریت فاجعه) و طراحی شبکه زنجیره تأمین به ترتیب در رتبه‌های اول تا سوم قرار گرفتند. 
کلیدواژه‌ها
تاب‌آوری زنجیره‌تأمین
تاپسیس توسعه یافته
تأمین‌کنندگان
حداقل مربعات جزئی
دلفی فازی

عنوان مقاله English

Conceptual modeling of factors affecting the resilience of the supply chain and ranking of medical equipment suppliers of Tehran Besat Hospital with the combined application of Fuzzy Delphi, PLS, and Improved TOPSIS

نویسندگان English

Mazher Rezaei Far 1
Reza Eslami 2
Nima Saberifard 3
1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Management, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Aja University of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Aero, Tehran, Iran.
3 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Industrial Management, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
چکیده English

Objective: The primary objective of this study is to develop a conceptual model of the factors influencing supply chain resilience and to rank the medical equipment suppliers of Baqiyatallah Hospital in Tehran using a hybrid approach that combines Fuzzy Delphi, Partial Least Squares (PLS), and Improved TOPSIS.
Methodology: This research is applied in terms of its purpose and descriptive in terms of data collection. Initially, the factors influencing supply chain resilience were identified and categorized based on a comprehensive review of the literature. Subsequently, the opinions of experts regarding these factors were analyzed using the Fuzzy Delphi method. The statistical population of this study comprises experts in the field of medical sciences, from whom 14 individuals were selected through purposive sampling.
Findings: In the data analysis phase, twenty criteria were selected using the Fuzzy Delphi method. The conceptual model of the factors influencing supply chain resilience was then developed using the Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach, which resulted in the selection of thirteen key criteria for the final model. Furthermore, the ranking of medical equipment suppliers was conducted using the Improved TOPSIS method.
Conclusion: The results of the conceptual model indicate that the criteria of backup plan development, recovery planning, disaster management (disaster planning and command), and supply chain network design ranked first to third, respectively, in terms of their impact on supply chain resilience. 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Supply chain resilience
Improved TOPSIS
suppliers
Partial Least Square
fuzzy Delphi

  •  

    • آذر، ع، قنواتی، م و غلام‎زاده، ر. (1391). مدلسازی‌مسیری-ساختاری در مدیریت: کاربرد نرم‌افزار SmartPLS، انتشارات نگاه دانش.
    • جعفرنژاد، ا. ، هاشمی پطرودی، ح و طلایی، ح. (1396). رویکردهای نوین در مدیریت زنجیره تأمین. چاپ دوم، انتشارات نگاه دانش.
    • خادمی جلگه نژاد, احمدی کهنعلی, حیرانی. (2019). عوامل مؤثر بر تاب‌آوری زنجیرۀ تأمین بیمارستان (مطالعه کیفی) فصلنامه بیمارستان، 18(2): 73-61.
    • خادمی جلگه‎نژاد، احمدی کهن‎علی و حیرانی. (2020). آینده‌پژوهی زنجیرۀ تأمین تاب آور بیمارستان با سناریو نگاری منطق شهودی. فصلنامه بیمارستان، 3(19): 19-9.
    • خدابخش، م، دهقان نیری، م، امامیان، س. ا. ح و سیدامیر، حسین. (2018). شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی عوامل تاب‌آوری زنجیرۀ تأمین در شرایط بحرانی با رویکرد پدافند غیر عامل. فصلنامه پدافند غیرعامل، 9(1): 36-25.
    • فارسیجانی، ح و حسین‎بیگی، ع. (1396). اصول و مفاهیم اساسی مدیریت تولید و عملیات، انتشارات باور.
    • معزز، هاشم، فتحی و رمضانی کرمانی، داوود. (2021). ارزیابی تامین‌کنندگان تاب‌آور با استفاده از سیستم نسبی فازی و فرآیند تحلیل شبکه‎ای. علوم و تکنولوژی محیط زیست، 23(1): 212-201.
    • Ambulkar, S., Blackhurst, J., & Grawe, S. (2015). Firms' resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination. Journal of Operations Management, 33–34, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.11.002
    • Ates, A., & Bititci, U. (2011). Change process: A key enabler for building resilience in SMEs. International Journal of Production Research, 49(18), 5601–5611. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.563825
    • Banaeian, N., Mobli, H., Fahimnia, B., Nielsen, I. E., & Omid, M. (2016). Green supplier selection using fuzzy group decision-making methods: A case study from the agri-food industry. Computers & Operations Research, 89, 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2016.02.015
    • Basole, R. C., & Bellamy, M. A. (2014). Supply network structure, visibility, and risk diffusion: A computational approach. Decision Sciences, 45(4), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12099
    • Bhamra, R., Dani, S., & Burnard, K. (2011). Resilience: The concept, a literature review and future directions. International Journal of Production Research, 49(18), 5375–5393. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.563826
    • Birkie, S. E. (2016). Operational resilience and lean: In search of synergies and trade-offs. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 27(2), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-07-2015-0054
    • Boran, F. E., Genç, S., Kurt, M., & Akay, D. (2009). A multicriteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision-making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(8), 11363–11368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.039
    • Carvalho, H., Azevedo, C. G., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2012). Agile and resilient approaches to supply chain management: Influence on performance and competitiveness. Logistics Research, 4(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-012-0064-2
    • Chen, C. T., Lin, C. T., & Huang, S. F. (2006). A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 102(2), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.03.009
    • Demirtas, E. A., & Üstün, Ö. (2008). An integrated multiobjective decision-making process for supplier selection and order allocation. Omega, 36(1), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2005.11.003
    • Erol, O., Brian, J. S., & Mansouri, M. O. (2010). A framework for investigation into extended enterprise resilience. Enterprise Information Systems, 4(2), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517570903474304
    • Falagara Sigala, I., Sirenko, M., Comes, T., & Kovács, G. (2022). Mitigating personal protective equipment (PPE) supply chain disruptions in pandemics: A system dynamics approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 42(13), 128–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-09-2021-0608
    • Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analysis. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
    • Gebhardt, M., Spieske, A., Kopyto, M., & Birkel, H. (2022). Increasing global supply chains’ resilience after the COVID-19 pandemic: Empirical results from a Delphi study. Journal of Business Research, 150, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.008
    • Golmohammadi, D., & Mellat-Parast, M. (2012). Developing a grey-based decision-making model for supplier selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 137(2), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.025
    • Hosseini, S., Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2019). Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis. Transportation Research: Part E, 125, 285–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.03.001
    • Ivanov, D. (2018). Structural dynamics and resilience in supply chain risk management. Springer.
    • Ivanov, D. (2021). Introduction to supply chain resilience: Management, modelling, technology. Springer.
    • Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2021). OR-methods for coping with the ripple effect in supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic: Managerial insights and research implications. International Journal of Production Economics, 232, 107921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107921
    • Jafarnejad, A., Momeni, M., Razavi Hajiagha, S. H., & Faridi Khorshidi, M. (2019). A dynamic supply chain resilience model for the medical equipment industry. Journal of Modelling in Management, 14(3), 816–840. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-11-2018-0195
    • Kim, Y., Chen, Y. S., & Linderman, K. (2015). Supply network disruption and resilience: A network structural perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 33–34, 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.10.006
    • Kokangul, A., & Susuz, Z. (2009). Integrated analytical hierarchy process and mathematical programming for supplier selection problem with quantity discount. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33(3), 1417–1429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2008.01.021
    • Lawrence, J. M., et al. (2020). Leveraging a Bayesian network approach to model and analyze supplier vulnerability to severe weather risk: A case study of the US pharmaceutical supply chain following Hurricane Maria. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 49, Article 101607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101607
    • Li, G. D., Yamaguchi, D., & Nagai, M. (2007). A grey-based decision-making approach to the supplier selection problem. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(3), 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2006.11.021
    • Li, Y., Chen, K., Collignon, S., & Ivanov, D. (2021). Ripple effect in the supply chain network: Forward and backward disruption propagation, network health, and firm vulnerability. European Journal of Operational Research, 291(3), 1117–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.09.053
    • Li, Y., Zobel, C. W., Seref, O., & Chatfield, D. C. (2020). Network characteristics and supply chain resilience under conditions of risk propagation. International Journal of Production Economics, 223, 107529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107529
    • Liu, M., Liu, Z., Chu, F., Zheng, F., & Chu, C. (2021). A new robust dynamic Bayesian network approach for disruption risk assessment under the supply chain ripple effect. International Journal of Production Research, 59(1), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1841318
    • Mamouni, L. E. A., Mazzarol, T., Ghadouani, A., & Schilizzi, S. G. M. (2014). The resilience architecture framework: Four organizational archetypes. European Management Journal, 32, 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2012.11.007.
    • McManus, S., Seville, E., Vargo, J., & Brunsdon, D. (2008). Facilitated process for improving organizational resilience. Natural Hazards Review, 9(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2008)9:2(81).
    • Moons, K., Waeyenbergh, G., & Pintelon, L. (2019). Measuring the logistics performance of internal hospital supply chains: A literature study. Omega, 82, 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.01.007
    • Ojha, R., Ghadge, A., Tiwari, M. K., & Bititci, U. S. (2018). Bayesian network modelling for supply chain risk propagation. International Journal of Production Research, 56(17), 5795–5819. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1467059.
    • Peck, H. (2005). Drivers of supply chain vulnerability: An integrated framework. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management,35(4),210–232. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030510599904
    • Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090910954873
    • Qazi, A., Dickson, A., & Gaudenzi, B. (2018). Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility-based approach for managing supply chain risks. International Journal of Production Economics, 196, 24–42.            https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.11.008
    • Rahman, S., et al. (2021). Assessing cyber resilience of additive manufacturing supply chains leveraging data fusion technique: A model to generate cyber resilience index of a supply chain. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 35, 911–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.09.008
    • Rajesh, R., & Ravi, V. (2015). Supplier selection in resilient supply chains: A grey relational analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86, 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.054
    • Richtner, A., & Lofsten, H. (2014). Managing in turbulence: How the capacity for resilience influences creativity. R&D Management, 44(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12050
    • Safari, H., Fagheyi, M. S., Ahangari, S. S., & Fathi, M. R. (2012). Applying the PROMETHEE method based on entropy weight for supplier selection. Business Management and Strategy, 3(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.5296/bms.v3i1.1656
    • Sawik, T. (2020). Supply chain disruption management (2nd ed.). Springer.
    • Sawyerr, E., & Harrison, C. (2022). Resilience in healthcare supply chains: A review of the UK’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-09-2021-0403
    • Ullah Ibne Hossain, N., et al. (2022). Role of systems engineering attributes in enhancing supply chain resilience: Healthcare in context of COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon, 8(6), e09592.         https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09592
    • Vinodh, S., Anesh Ramiya, R., & Gautham, S. G. (2011). Application of fuzzy analytic network process for supplier selection in a manufacturing organization. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1), 272–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.057
    • Wu, D. (2009). Supplier selection: A hybrid model using DEA, decision tree, and neural network. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(5), 9105–9112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.12.039
    • Yang, C. C., & Chen, B. S. (2006). Supplier selection using combined analytical hierarchy process and grey relational analysis. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(7), 926–941. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380610688241
    • Yao, Y., & Fabbe-Costes, N. (2018). Can you measure resilience if you are unable to define it? The analysis of Supply Network Resilience (SNRES). Supply Chain Forum, 19(4), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2018.1540248
علوم و فنون نظامی
دوره 20، شماره 69
پاییز 1403
صفحه 5-44