Examining the challenges of dealing with unmanned aircraft systems
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to examine the challenges of dealing with drone systems and its impact on the air defense system in the future battle scene and to provide solutions to solve the existing problems and obstacles. This research is of an applied type and library study methods and reference to documents and questionnaire tools were used to collect data and targeted sampling was used to select the sample size of the statistical population under research. AHP method has been used to weight and determine the priority of air defense challenges (detection systems, command and control systems, and weapon systems) on the dependent variable (combating drone systems). The results of the research showed that the main research variables with a correlation coefficient of less than 0.1 have an effect on dealing with the drone system. The suggestions of this research are the emphasis and attention of the air defense commanders on the stated challenges according to the results of the research, as well as the need to upgrade the air defense systems in the future battle scenes, with the priority of adopting comprehensive defense strategies and improving the capabilities of detecting drones. The passenger has a low radar cross-section and the use of new technologies in weapon systems.
Castrillo, V. U., Manco, A., Pascarella, D., & Gigante, G. (2022). A review of counter-UAS technologies for cooperative defensive teams of drones. Drones, 6(3), 65.
Dictionary of Military and Assocaited Terms, 2015, Military-Strated
Gettinger, D. (2019). The drone databook. Center for the Study of the Drone.
Falanga, D., Kim, S., & Scaramuzza, D. (2019). How fast is too fast? The role of perception latency in high-speed sense and avoid. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 4(2), 1884-1891.
Deepan Sarma and Paul Quinn, eds., “D3. 1 – Data protection, Social, Ethical and Legal Frameworks,” Diginext, Advanced hoListic Adverse Drone Detection, Identification Neutralisation program, February 2018. http: // eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ALADDIN_D3. 1_DataProtectionSoEL_Framework_V1_0_PU. pdf
Martins, B. O., Michel, A. H., & Silkoset, A. (2020). Countering the Drone Th reat. Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO).
Balamurugan, G., Valarmathi, J., & Naidu, V. P. S. (2016, October). Survey on UAV navigation in GPS denied environments. In 2016 International conference on signal processing, communication, power and embedded system (SCOPES) (pp. 198-204). IEEE.
Letter from John R. Dermody, P. E., Director, Office of Airport Safety and Standards, U. S. Federal Aviation Administration, May 7, 2019. https: //www. faa. gov/airports/ airport_safety/media/Updated-Information-UAS-Detection-Countermeasures-Technology Airports-20190507. Pdf
Brooks, S. H., Jacobus, C., Kohestani, C. G., Stikar, J. A., & Faye, E. J. (2019). Counter unmanned aircraft systems market survey (uur) (No. SAND-2019-2801). Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States).
Waxman, M. C. (2018). The Caroline Affair in the Evolving International Law of Self-Defense. Matthew Waxman, The Caroline Affair in Evolving International Law of Self-Defense,(Aug. 28, 2018), The LawFare Book Review, Columbia Public Law Research Paper, (14-600).
NATO Standardization Office (NSO), ‘ATP-3. 3. 8. 1 Minimum Training Requirements for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Operators and Pilots’, Edition B Version 1, May 2019.
Paulina Glass, “Russia’s New Arctic Drones Are Built to Spot Ships,” Defense One, December 11, 2018. https: // defenseone. com/technology/2018/12/ russias- newarctic- drones-are-built-spot-ships/153444/
Crino, S., & Dreby, A. (2019). Drone Technology Proliferation in Small Wars. Small Wars Journal, 3.
Walker-Roberts and M. Hammoudeh, Written evidence submitted by Manchester Metropolitan University, U. K. Parliament Defense Committee, Domestic Threat of Drone Inquiry, May 9, 2019. data. parliament. uk/writtenevidence/ committeeevidence. svc/evidencedocument/ defence- committee/domestic-threat-of-drones/written/ 101797. html
The NATO Countering Unmanned Aircraft System Working Group (NATO C-UAS WG) has been formally established through the approval of the Countering Class I UAS practical framework, endorsed by NATO’s Defense Ministers on their meeting on 13–14 Feb. 2019.
Zeng, Y., Lyu, J., & Zhang, R. (2018). Cellular-connected UAV: Potential, challenges, and promising technologies. IEEE Wireless Communications, 26(1), 120-127.
mohammadi,A , Navade toupchi,H , forozan,I , Shokohi,H and Ejabi,E . (2023). Examining the challenges of dealing with unmanned aircraft systems. Military Science and Tactics, 19(63), 199-227. doi: 10.22034/qjmst.2023.553068.1709
MLA
mohammadi,A , , Navade toupchi,H , , forozan,I , , Shokohi,H , and Ejabi,E . "Examining the challenges of dealing with unmanned aircraft systems", Military Science and Tactics, 19, 63, 2023, 199-227. doi: 10.22034/qjmst.2023.553068.1709
HARVARD
mohammadi A, Navade toupchi H, forozan I, Shokohi H, Ejabi E. (2023). 'Examining the challenges of dealing with unmanned aircraft systems', Military Science and Tactics, 19(63), pp. 199-227. doi: 10.22034/qjmst.2023.553068.1709
CHICAGO
A mohammadi, H Navade toupchi, I forozan, H Shokohi and E Ejabi, "Examining the challenges of dealing with unmanned aircraft systems," Military Science and Tactics, 19 63 (2023): 199-227, doi: 10.22034/qjmst.2023.553068.1709
VANCOUVER
mohammadi A, Navade toupchi H, forozan I, Shokohi H, Ejabi E. Examining the challenges of dealing with unmanned aircraft systems. Military Science and Tactics. 2023;19(63):199-227 (In Persian). doi: 10.22034/qjmst.2023.553068.1709
