There are various models of C2 to make decision making that overcomes the complexity of decision making.In order to select an appropriate model in the air defense network, the researcher intends to study a variety of decision models, by studying their characteristics and their differences to the appropriate parameters for an optimal model.The main purpose of the research is to determine the strengths and weaknesses of decision-making models in C2 for use in the air defense network.The main question of the research is : what is the strengths and weaknesses of Ooda, Lawson, Kellin and Wahl's decision making models for C2 for use in the air defense network? The applied research is a descriptive and its approach is gathering and collecting information in a field.The statistical population was calculated with a specific coefficient is 135 and a sample size of people is 100.Therefore, in order to select an appropriate model of decision making models, Ooda, Lawson, Klein, and Wahl were studied. By examining the qualities and differences between quantitative and qualitative characteristics, the loop control parameters, Tempo, precision, interaction, and details For an optimal model in the C2 for use in various environmental conditions, the air defense network achieved.Also, to prioritize the indices obtained using the feeder: interaction, loop control, Tempo, detailed examination, and details, which should be considered in designing a decision making model.In the end, the researcher concluded that the combination of the Ooda and Wahl model could meet the needs of the country's air defense network.
شهلائی، ناصر، مدیریت استراتژیک در نیروهای مسلح، انتشارات دافوس آجا، چاپ اول، 1385.
شیخ، محمدرضا، فرماندهی و کنترل، انتشارات دانشگاه فرماندهی و ستاد آجا، تهران،1391.
عمید، حسن، فرهنگ فارسی عمید، موسسه انتشارات امیرکبیر، 1383.
غیاثآبادی، فعلی، انصاری، عباس، صابر، محمد، ارزیابی حلقه اودا در DBA و DBK با رویکرد فرماندهی و کنترل، هفتمین کنفرانس علمی فرماندهی و کنترل ایران
فرجپور علمداری، عباس، بازطراحی شبکه و سامانه فرماندهی و کنترل (C4ISR) پدافند هوایی در کلیه سطوح سازمانی جهت مقابله با تهدیدات ناهمگون، پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد، دافوس آجا، 1390.
فهیمی، مهدی و محمدرضا ولوی، مروری بر ادبیات و معرفی طرحهای مهم C4I، انتشارات مؤسسه آموزشی تحقیقاتی صنایع دفاعی.
مرادی، بیژن، فرهنگنامه علوم و فناوری دفاعی، موسسه آموزشی و تحقیقاتی صنایع دفاعی، 1390.
معین، محمد، فرهنگ فارسی، انتشارات بهزاد، ۱۳۹۰.
مفاهیم فرماندهی و کنترل مشترک (نسخه نهایی)، وزارت دفاع آمریکا، سپتامبر 2005.
الوانی، سید مهدی، 1387. مدیریت عمومی. تهران: نشر نی، چاپ 21، تهران، 1383.
ولیوند زمانی، حسین؛ لونی، محمدرضا؛ ملکی، غلامرضا؛ تصمیمسازی و تصمیمگیری در محیط نظامی؛ دانشگاه فرماندهی و ستاد آجا؛ چاپ اول؛ 1391.
· Berndt,Brehmer, The Dynamic OODA Loop: Amalgamating Boyd’s OODA Loop and the Cybernetic Approach to Command and Control, 10th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium The Future of C2, Department of War Studies Swedish National Defence College.
· Boyes, J.L. Issues in C3I Program Management: Requirements, Systems, and Operations, AFCEA International Press, 1984.
· Brehmer, Berndt, The Dynamic OODA Loop: Amalgamating Boyd’s OODA Loop and the Cybernetic Approach to Command and Control, Department of War Studies Swedish National Defence College, http://www.dodccrp.org/events/10th_ICCRTS/CD/papers/365.pdf
· Coakley, T.P. Command and Control for War and Peace, National Defense University Press, 1991.
· Deepika Verma,study and analysis of various decision making models in an organization, Rajdhani College, University of Delhi, India,2014.
· Dehn, D.M. Private communication, National Aerospace Laboratory (NLR), Amsterdam, Netherlands, 26 February 2004.
· Dennis Andersson, Mission Experience: How to Model and Capture it to Enable Vicarious Learning, Linköpings university,2013.
· Gary A. Klein, Roberta Calderwood, and Anne Clinton-Cirocco, “Rapid Decisionmaking on the Fireground, proceedings, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 30th Annual Meeting, Dayton, Ohio, 1986, 1, 576-80;
· Klein, “Recognition-primed decisions, in Advances in Man-Machine Systems Research, ed. W.B. Rouse (Greenwich,CT: JAI Press, Inc. 1989).
· Hammond, G. T. (2001). The mind of war. John Boyd and American Security. Washington:Smithsonian Press.
· John F. Schmitt and Gary A. Klein, “A Recognitional Planning Model,” proceedings, Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, Newport, RI, 1999.
· Jon J. Fallesen and Julia Pounds, “Identifying and Testing a Naturalistic Approach for Cognitive Skills Training,” in eds New York: Doubleday, 2003).
· Keus, H.E. 2002. A Framework for Analysis of Decision Processes in Teams. Proceedings, CCRP Symposium, June 2002, Monterey, CA, USA
· Klein, G. 1998. Sources of Power: How people make decisions. MIT Press,Cambridge, Mass. USA.
· Klein, G. A. (1997). The Recognition Primed Decision (RPD) model: Looking Back, Looking Forward. In Naturalistic Decision Making.
· Klein, Gary A. A Recognition-Primed Decision (RPD) Model of Rapid Decision Making, www.ise.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Klein_1989_AMMSR_RPDM.pdf.
· Major Michael M. Sweeney, An Introduction to Command and Control, June 2002, Master’s Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School,Monterey, CA 93943-5000.
· Mayk, I. & Rubin, I. 1988. Paradigms for Understanding C3, Anyone? In Johnson, S.E. & Levis, A.H. eds. 1988. Science of Command and Control: Coping with uncertainty. AFCEA International Press, Washington DC, USA, pp 48-61
· Meister, Spiegel, David, Douglas K. Review of Command and Control Models and Theory,1990, Univ. of Wisconsin.
· Michael M. Sweeney, USMC, An Introduction to Command and Control, Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, June 2002.
· Mitchell, C. M. Morris, J. G. Ockerman, J. J. & Potter, W. J. (1997). Recognition primed decision making as a technique to support reuse in software design. In C. Zsambok & G. Klein (Eds.), Naturalistic decision making.
· Neville A. Stanton, Guy Walker, Models of Command and Control, Defence Technology Centre for Human Factors Integration,BIT Lab, School of Engineering and Design, Brunel University,Uxbridge.
· Ron Azuma, Mike Daily, Chris Furmanski, A Review of Time Critical Decision Making Models and Human Cognitive Processes, HRL Laboratories, LLC 3011 Malibu Canyon Rd. Malibu,P4
· Wallenius,Klas,Genric support for decision making in management and command and control, 2004, stockholm.
· Wohl, F.G. 1981. Force Management Decision Requirements for Air Force Tactical Command & Control. IEEE Transactions in Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-11, 9, 618-639 (September 1981)
· Woo-Seop Yun, Il-Chul Moon and Tae-Eog Lee, Agent-Based Simulation of Time to Decide: Military Commands and Time Delays,2015, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation.
Azadbayani,M and mohammadi,A . (2018). A comparative study of decision-making models in command and control for implementation in the integrated air defense network of the country. Military Science and Tactics, 14(45), 5-27.
MLA
Azadbayani,M , and mohammadi,A . "A comparative study of decision-making models in command and control for implementation in the integrated air defense network of the country", Military Science and Tactics, 14, 45, 2018, 5-27.
HARVARD
Azadbayani M, mohammadi A. (2018). 'A comparative study of decision-making models in command and control for implementation in the integrated air defense network of the country', Military Science and Tactics, 14(45), pp. 5-27.
CHICAGO
M Azadbayani and A mohammadi, "A comparative study of decision-making models in command and control for implementation in the integrated air defense network of the country," Military Science and Tactics, 14 45 (2018): 5-27,
VANCOUVER
Azadbayani M, mohammadi A. A comparative study of decision-making models in command and control for implementation in the integrated air defense network of the country. Military Science and Tactics. 2018;14(45):5-27 (In Persian).
